Set the interval by cost, not the calendar
Every clean costs labour, water, fuel and equipment time. Every day between cleans costs energy. The best schedule balances the two, and the balance point differs from plant to plant.
Practice shows how far apart the answers are. LONGi’s O&M manual asks for cleaning at least every 20–30 days in dry areas and every 40–50 days in rainy ones. What South African plants actually do is in soiling losses in South Africa.
Returns also fall with each extra clean. In southern Spain, one well-timed summer clean raised a 1 MW plant’s profit by up to 3.6%, while extra cleans paid less (Micheli et al. 2021). Both the number of cleans and their timing matter.
How do you set the cleaning interval by cost? Clean when the energy you win back is worth more than the clean. Research on global soiling costs (Ilse et al., Joule, 2019) shows the cost-optimal number of cleans rises with yield, soiling rate and tariff, falls with the cost of a clean, and responds gently: doubling the tariff doesn’t double the cleans. For your plant’s numbers, use the calculator.
How does rain change the answer in South Africa?
A cost-based interval assumes dust builds up without a break. Rain breaks that assumption. South African rain findings, including Kalkbult near De Aar, are in soiling losses in South Africa.
In practice:
- Wet months: rain may do much of the cleaning for loose dust. Skip a scheduled clean when the soiling sensor says the glass is still clean.
- Dry months: the cost-based interval applies, because nothing else resets the loss.
- Bonded soiling: rain doesn’t remove cemented dust or lichen, and neither does a shorter interval. These need removal chemistry (IEA PVPS 2022; Ilse et al. 2019). See cement dust on solar panels.
Working plants show the same pattern. A 330 MW plant in Vietnam was cleaned by robot about four times in the dry season and not at all in the rainy season, and coated strings gained more over water-cleaned strings in the dry months than in the wet ones. On the Santiago Solar tracker plant in Chile, where frequent sandstorms drive the number of cleans, the O&M team cleaned four to six times a year, alternating one wet clean with two dry ones.
Timing of each clean matters as much as the average interval. Both need a daily soiling measurement: see how to measure PV soiling.
How do South African plants decide when to clean today? Survey figures for how often South African IPPs wash, and with what kit, are in soiling losses in South Africa.
A rule of thumb reported in South Africa is to clean when a constant gap of more than 50 W/m² appears between a cleaned and an uncleaned reference cell. A trigger like that is better than the calendar, but it ignores the tariff and the cost of a clean. Two plants with the same dust but different tariffs should not clean on the same trigger.
What else moves the optimum?
| Factor | Effect on the optimum | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Soiling environment | US natural desert soils 0–2.0% a month; dry farmland up to 11.5% a month | IEA PVPS (2022) |
| Cleaning method | Robots cost €2.4–8.2/m² in capex and remove more than 95% of soiling; a cheaper clean per pass supports more passes | Ilse et al. (2019) |
| Anti-soiling coating | Halving the soiling rate cuts optimal cleans by 29% and justifies about €1.3–2.2/m² of coating | Ilse et al. (2019) |
| Cleaning speed | A coating that lets a tractor brush run faster saves crew and machine time on every pass | Santiago Solar tracker plant, Chile |
| Water | Scarce or trucked water raises the cost per clean; a full wet wash of a 10 MWp plant takes about 50–150 m³ | NREL (2018); Naicker (2018) |
| Contaminant | Cemented dust and lichen don’t respond to frequency; they need removal chemistry | IEA PVPS (2022); Ilse et al. (2019) |
A coating changes the maths only if it works on your site. Long-term field results are typically 20–50% less soiling, and some coatings make soiling worse (Ilse et al. 2019). In a Northern Cape trial, a hydrophobic coating increased dust soiling (du Plessis et al. 2020). Prove it on your own strings before you stretch the interval.
How do you set the interval for your own plant?
- Measure the soiling rate with a soiling station or sensor. How to fit that rate is in soiling ratio, rate and loss explained.
- Cost a full clean honestly: labour, water and its treatment, fuel, equipment time and chemistry.
- Use the calculator for your tariff and yield.
- Set a dry-season interval, and let measured soiling decide whether to skip a clean after rain.
- Review each season, and after any change of method, water or coating.
RenewChem designs cleaning strategies this way, with the O&M team that runs the plant: method, interval, water treatment, equipment and crew procedure. See cleaning and O&M strategy and working with your O&M team.
About this guide
Sources
- Ilse et al., Techno-economic assessment of soiling losses and mitigation strategies, Joule 3:2303–2321 (2019), Eq. 7 and Tables 1–2
- Ilse et al. (2019), open-access copy
- IEA PVPS Task 13, Soiling Losses: Impact on the Performance of PV Plants (2022), pp. 58–59
Show all 15 sourcesShow fewer
- Diouf et al., EPJ Photovoltaics 13:21 (2022)
- Micheli et al., Energy 215 (2021)
- NREL (now the National Laboratory of the Rockies), Best Practices for O&M of PV and Energy Storage Systems (2018), p. 26
- LONGi, O&M Manual V2.0, p. 10
- Naicker, Investigating the O&M strategy of solar PV plants in South Africa, North-West University (2018), hosted by SAPVIA
- du Plessis, MEng thesis on soiling at Kalkbult, Stellenbosch University (2017)
- du Plessis et al., IET Renewable Power Generation 14(15) (2020)
- Global Solar Atlas, Upington site data
- IPP Office, REIPPPP tariffs by bid window (September 2020)
- Government of South Africa, media statement on REIPPPP bid-window tariffs (8 December 2022)
- Case study: Chemitek (Portugal), with BIM AC Renewables: D-Solar Defendor, 330 MW plant, Vietnam (2020–21)
- Case study: Chemitek (Portugal), with EDF Energies Nouvelles and Marubeni: D-Solar Defendor, Santiago Solar, Chile (2020–21)



